13/09/2012

Crown Research Institute Speaks With Forked Tongue In Opposing GMO Accountability

 

GE Free NZ and Bay of Plenty submitters have received notice of an appeal to the Environment Court, lodged by Crown Research Institute (CRI), Scion. This appeal contests the Environment Bay of Plenty Regional council's (BOPRC) "Precautionary approach" to GE release and field trialling in the region.

It is sheer hypocrisy for Scion to actively oppose council policy designed to protect the public interest and is in stark contrast to previous claims that it supports a precautionary approach to GMOs.

Scion has received tens of millions of dollars from taxpayers to develop GE pine trees. Now it is using public money to oppose policies designed to keep it accountable to the communities that fund it.

"The precautionary GE wording that Scion is attacking is simply the regionís insurance policy. The council have included a commentary outlining the documented inadequacies of present legislation under HSNO. This is an important first step in protecting ratepayers from unintended adverse impacts from GMOs," says Jon Carapiet, spokesman for GE-Free NZ in food and environment.

"If Scion is truly committed to sustainable land use, it should have no problem with the wording set out in the BOP proposed Regional Policy Statement. The precautionary GE wording does not mean that the council will place any requirements above and beyond those Scion claims will be set by national regulator, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)."

The action taken by Scion this week is of concern to primary producers in various sectors right across New Zealand. Crown Research Institutes should not be attempting to undermine the sustainable management of natural and physical resources by local authorities.

"The socialised risk of GE experiments onto the public under inadequate legislation (HSNO Act) means that local authorities everywhere should be concerned by Scion's move, and the potential placement locally of GE trials or containment facilities" says Jon Carapiet.

After a robust and transparent process of consultation with Bay of Plenty ratepayers and residents on the GE issue, the council is now in a position to represent the community on any GE application lodged with the EPA.

Where EPA decisions on GM trials and releases are truly precautionary, then the council will not need to act. However, if an EPA decision does not provide sufficient protection for local foresters, farmers or the wider community, the councilís precautionary policy will allow proper safeguards to be introduced.

Community concerns over GE experimentation in the field continues to grow, after a number of documented breaches of the conditions of approval by ERMA for GE field trials (including NZ Crown Research Institutes Scion, Crop & Food Research, AgResearch and HortResearch*.
ENDS

More information:
Jon Carapiet - 021 0507681

Notes

1. Most recently, Scionís CEO, Warren Parker is cited as supporting a
precautionary approach to GMOs in the NZ Farmers Weekly (21 May 2012 edition, p. 28
see

http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/fc0e962b#/fc0e962b/28
when he refers to the precautionary approach recommended by the Royal Commission into Modification (back in 2000)


2. Scion is seeking deletion of the following policy in the Proposed Regional
Polcy Statement:

The existence of genetically modified organisms in the environment has
generated community concern. Of particular concern is the placement and
location of trial and containment facilities. The Bay of Plenty Regional Council
promotes a precautionary approach to the release, control and use of genetically
modified organisms within the region. The precautionary approach is a necessary
response to unresolved issues of potential liability, environmental risks,
economic costs, and cultural and social effects. The Hazardous Substances
and New Organisms Act 1996 contains specific legislation for managing
genetically modified organisms. These legislative functions are carried out by
the Environmental Protection Authority. Current legislation may be inadequate to
manage potential adverse effects from the use of genetically modified organisms
in the region.

Proposed Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement. Council Decisions, August
2012

3. all comments from NZ FARMERS WEEKLY newspaper on GE pines/ Scion/ precautionary approach to GMOs

16 April NZ Farmers weekly
p. l6 "GM pine trials vandalised"
by Rebecca Harper

http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/b55ad62a#/b55ad62a/16

***

21 May 2012 edition
"Viewpoints on damage to GE pines"
p. 28

Dr. Ron Lopert of Tauranga vs Dr. Warren Parker, CEO of Scion
(Scion Chief Executive responds)

http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/fc0e962b#/fc0e962b/28

***
16 July 2012
p. 20 letter to editor

"Keep experiments in the laboratory"
by Linda Grammer, Maungakaramea, Northland

http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/685932e3#/685932e3/20

4. IAG (Interim Assessment Group) approval of the GE tamarillo trial at HortReseach Kerikeri facility in Northland.


The Royal Commission was quite clear about GE tamarillo trial #51 in their Report (Chapter 6, p. 123), stating: "We heard considerable public doubt about the adequacy of the containment of this trial. The Commission considers that this public concern was justified."

The Royal Commission identified the risks from horizontal gene transfer and other forms of genetic pollution, stating:

"In light of concerns that have arisen this year in connection with horizontal gene transfer (HGT) we consider that rigorous monitoring of field trials is essential and that all material associated with the trial must be removable from the site."

back to directory